How do you prefer to learn?

There are different theories and explanations of how people learn. Some talk about being a visual, auditory or kinaesthetic learner, but the theory I use most was Learning Styles by Honey and Mumford.   Their research lead to 4 different preferences for learning:

  • Activist

  • Reflector

  • Theorist

  • Pragmatist

Activists are open minded and enthusiastic. They tend to act first and think later. They enjoy activities such as brainstorming and like new challenges. They may get bored with the implementation phase.

Reflectors like to think, to ponder and observe. They seek to collect data, to analyse and are quite cautious. In a meeting they are more likely to take a back set, preferring to listen and so have a lower profile.

Theorists think things through logically and are perfectionist in style. They like to analyse, to think things through logically and be detached in approach. As they seek to maximise certainty they can be uncomfortable when there is insufficient data to make a decision.

Pragmatists like to try out new ideas, They will act quickly, can be seen as impatient and like open ended discussions. There preference is to be practical.

A questionnaire to assess your style used to be available in the back of their book, now to assess your learning styles you need to pay £10 to take the questionnaire on line.

You can find out more here:

http://www.peterhoney.com/content/LearningStylesQuestionnaire.html

Email This Post | Print This Post | Permalink

Spread the word: del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ask Blogg-Buzz Google Netscape Rojo Spurl StumbleUpon Tailrank Technorati Windows Live Wists Yahoo!

2 Responses to “How do you prefer to learn?”

  1. steve Says:

    I know that i tend to learn better by doing. Delve right in and then work out the mistakes after so you get better and better each time. Or i dont mind a quick overview.

    However I cannot learn by reading books or having someone talk to me all day about something, my eyes glaze and i switch off after about 30 minutes. So without taking the test, and even though I think that I am Logical, i would say it is a mixture on mainly activist, followed by a bit of Pragmatism then a little tiny bit of theorist thrown in :)

    Steve

  2. Denise Taylor, career guide & assessments expert Says:

    I think it is really useful to think about how best we learn, so we can adapt and play to what comes easy to us.

    If you now you learn best through getting stuck in then look for practical learning rather than to get out a book. For example if you need to learn how to change a washer, have someone show you what to do rather than get a book out.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 
       
 
 
 

Complete the box below to receive your FREE eProgramme "10 steps to finding a job you love" Value: £10.00 / $20

"The 10 steps programme is a real eye opener . It helped me think logically about what I like in a job & what I want from a job. I have recommended at least two people to log onto your website & try them." Louise Jennings

 
Enter your name
Enter your email

 
 
       
       
       
   
   
 
     
  Career Coaching: Students, Graduates, Adults, Organisation, FAQs  
  Assessments: Highlands Ability Battery, Myers Briggs Type Indicator, Strong Interest Inventory, Firo B, Thomas Kilmann, CPI, 16PF5, FAQs  
  Job Search: CVs, Interview Coaching, Self Marketing, Job Search Programme  
  Resources: Articles, eBooks, Newsletter, eCourses, Free Tele-seminars, Book Suggestions, Links, Research Zone
 
  About Us: Our approach, About Denise, Clients say, What happens next, Affiliations  
  Shop: eBooks, Programmes, Values Cards, Phone Seminars  
     
   
 
©Amazing People 2007
 
 

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

 

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

  Valid CSS!